Legal Opinion

Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District v. United States

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 25, 2008No. Civil Action 07-cv-02244-EWN-MEHPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

EDWARD W. NOTTINGHAM, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District seeks declaratory and injunctive relief in this action invalidating a contract between the United States of America and the other above-captioned federal defendants (collectively the “United States”) and Defendant-In-tervenor City of Aurora (“Aurora”) per mitting Aurora to store water in Pueblo Reservoir, a facility of the Fryingpan-Ar-kansas (“Fry-Ark”) Project. This matter comes before the court on “United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss” and “The City of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moyle Petroleum v. LahoodDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2013
  2. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Division of Housing v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API