Legal Opinion · Dissent

William Kelly v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1955No. 11689Published

1DissentBiggs, Chief Judge

I think the judgment is an appealable one under Section 1291, Title 28 U.S.C., and that the decision of the majority is erroneous.

On November 24, 1954; the plaintiff secured a verdict against the defendant-appellant for $75,760. Under Rule 58, F.R.C.P., the clerk entered judgment forthwith on this verdict. On November 29, within ten days after the entry of judgment, the defendant-appellant made two timely motions, one for judgment n.o.v. under Rule 50(b), and another for a new trial under Rule 59(b). On June 6, 1955, the court below “dismissed” the motion for a new trial on the ground .that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bergeron v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Healy v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  4. Marten v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  5. Randolph v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API