Legal Opinion
Healy v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 28, 1950No. 9964_1PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for the plaintiff, whose action is based on the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S. C.A. § 51 et seq. Urged as grounds for reversal are the contentions that there was insufficient evidence to submit to the jury with respect to negligence and causation, that plaintiff’s decedent was outside the scope of his employment at the time of injury, and that the court below erroneously instructed the jury that if the decedent was on the way to his supervisor’s office to discuss a war bond, then as a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Globe Liquor Co. v. San RomanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Gaudiosi v. MellonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Charles Resnik v. La Paz Guest RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Sonnenblick-Goldman Corp. v. Thomas NowalkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Norman P. Calhoun, and Viola E. Calhoun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Plant Economy, Inc. v. Mirror Insulation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.