Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. McDonough

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1917No. Civil No. 1541PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Gila. F. B. Laine, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.

J. N. McDonough died testate at Globe, Arizona. His will was admitted to probate and the widow, Mary McDonough, was appointed executrix of his estate. From plaintiff’s complaint it appears that the value of the estate of McDonough, deceased, as inventoried and appraised in the probate proceedings, was $417.50 and consisted of community property. It is alleged that said Mc-Donough in his lifetime, together with E. F. Pfister and George E. Shute, jointly and severally executed their promissory note in favor of the First National Bank of Globe for the sum of $500. In the course of administration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dawson Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Shirley v. Waco Tap Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Vail v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  4. Miller v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Simonton v. SimontonIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Valley Bank v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Schofield v. GoldArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Platte County State Bank v. FrantzWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API