Legal Opinion

Continental Industries, Inc. v. Integrated Logistics Solutions LLC

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 2002No. 00-CV-0903-EA(C)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CLEARY, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER came before the Court on Plaintiff Continental Industries’ Motion to Compel the Production of Documents by Defendants Integrated Logistics Solutions, L.L.C. (“ILS”) and Integrated Logistics Solutions, Inc. (“ILS, Inc.”) [Dkt. # 166 & 168] Defendants have responded thereto. [Dkt. # 184] On November 21, 2002, the Court heard oral argument on the pending motion. Based upon the record herein, the briefs submitted by the parties and argument of counsel, the Court finds that the Motion to Compel should be DENIED.

I. Background

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steven M. Desrosiers v. John J. MoranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Jom, Inc., D/B/A Chipco International, Ltd. v. Adell Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Clinchfield Railroad Company v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Buttler v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  3. United States ex rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Chrisman v. Oklahoma County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  5. Crampton v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API