Legal Opinion
Jiles v. Wright Med. Tech., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 13, 2018No. Civil Action H–16–2080PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gray H. Miller, United States District Judge *830Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. ("WMT"). Dkt. 27. Having considered the motion, response, reply, record evidence, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
This case relates to plaintiff Quentin W. Jiles's former job as a delivery specialist with WMT. Dkt. 27. Jiles started working as a WMT delivery specialist on May 28, 2013. Dkt. 31, Ex. A (Jiles Aff.). WMT's delivery specialists make "pickups and deliveries of medical…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LHC Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rideau v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
- Benjamin T. Reed v. City of Floresville, Floresville Economic Development CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2026
- Logisys, Inc. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Lucas v. Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2025
- Marsh v. Homesite Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.