Legal Opinion

Gaspar v. Turn Technologies Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 29, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01274Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 4 AT SEATTLE 5 BRIAN GASPAR, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. C23-1274 TSZ 8 TURN TECHNOLOGIES INC; and MINUTE ORDER RAHIER RAHMAN, 9 Defendants. 10 11 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 12 (1) Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss second amended complaint, docket no. 33, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows. 13 (a) Breach of Contract: Defendants Turn Technologies, Inc. (“Turn”) 14 and Rahier Rahman argue that Plaintiff fails to state a breach…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly Park v. Karen ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Gladstone Technology, Partners, LLC v. DahlDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. McGINNITY v. Autonation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. McGinnity v. AutoNation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API