Legal Opinion

Chemical Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 27, 1934No. Docket No. 45604Published

The petitioner exchanged notes costing it $1,500,000 for second mortgage bonds of the value of $900,000, and claims to have thereby sustained a loss of $600,000. Held, such loss is allowable.

1Opinion of the Court

THE CHEMICAL NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Chemical Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

Docket No. 45604.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

30 B.T.A. 178; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1359;

March 27, 1934, Promulgated

The petitioner exchanged notes costing it $1,500,000 for second mortgage bonds of the value of $900,000, and claims to have thereby sustained a loss of $600,000. Held, such loss is allowable.

W. W. Spalding, Esq., for the petitioner.

Bruce A. Low, Esq., and T. G. Histon, Esq., for the respondent.

SEAWELL

The Commissioner determined deficiencies in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chemical Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  2. Chemical National Bank of New York v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API