Chemical National Bank of New York v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*182OPINION.
Seawell :
In this proceeding the petitioner contends that in computing its income tax liability for the year 1924 it is entitled to a deduction of $600,000, being the alleged difference between the cost to it of the notes of the Fruit Co. which it held and the fair market value of the second mortgage bonds of the Sugar Co. when received in exchange therefor.
The transaction by which the notes of the Fruit Co., executed by it and delivered to petitioner for the $1,500,000 loan made it, were exchanged for the second mortgage bonds of the Sugar Co., was one which might give rise to gain or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Prescott State Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Midland Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- First National Bank, Parkers Landing v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- West Lafayette Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chemical Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934