Legal Opinion
Mountain Queen Condominium Ass'n v. Haan
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 18, 1988No. 85SC472PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRSHBAUM, Justice.
In Haan v. Mountain Queen Condominium Association, 717 P.2d 969 (Colo.App.1985), the Court of Appeals held that under statutory provisions prohibiting the wrongful withholding of security deposits, §§ 38-12-101 to -103, 16A C.R.S. (1982) (hereinafter referred to as the “Security Deposit Act”),1 respondent Ronald J. Haan (Haan) is entitled to recover treble damages against petitioners Mountain Queen Condominium Association (Mountain Queen), Molly Nowlin (Nowlin), and Mar-celle B. Payton (Payton) for Mountain Queen’s failure to refund a payment made by Haan. Having granted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Stanske v. Wazee Electric Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Holmes v. Canlen Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Houle v. Adams State CollegeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Pratt v. McNally-Rathbone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Jackson & Co.(USA), Inc. v. Town of AvonColorado Court of Appeals · 2007