Tucker v. Finch
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Portage County. Tbe facts will sufficiently appear from tbe opinion. There was a verdict in favor of tbe defendant, and from tbe judgment entered thereon tbe plaintiff appealed. To tbe point that the witness Sanborn should not have been permitted to state what transpired between himself and tbe plaintiff while tbe plaintiff was seeking bis professional assistance, be cited 1 Greenl.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Portage County. Tbe facts will sufficiently appear from tbe opinion. There was a verdict in favor of tbe defendant, and from tbe judgment entered thereon tbe plaintiff appealed. To tbe point that the witness Sanborn should not have been permitted to state what transpired between himself and tbe plaintiff while tbe plaintiff was seeking bis professional assistance, be cited 1 Greenl. Ev. sec. 241; 1 Wait’s Pr. 240; 2 Pest on Ev. sec. 581,». 25.
1Opinion of the CourtObtoN, J.
There was an attachment issued in tbe suit of Baum, Fischer & Go. against tbe goods of one Henry Tucker, and levied upon goods in a store at Stevens Point as tbe property of said Henry Tucker, December 5, 1883, by tbe defendant, as sheriff of Portage county, and the appellant took said goods from the defendant’s possession by a writ of replevin in this action. The defendant answered, alleging substantially that, a short time before, tbe said Henry Tucker bought said goods, and many thousand dollars’ worth of other goods, from Baum, Fischer & Co. and other merchants, for his store in the city…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rutledge v. Price CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schutz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Holtz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. FrawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. SnowdenUtah Supreme Court · 1901
- Eastman v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1888