Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Kenton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1992No. 911SC144PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

On appeal defendants contend that the trial court erred by (1) granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs and denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment; (2) allowing the temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction; (3) denying defendants’ motion for a continuance; and (4) denying defendants’ motion to dismiss. We find defendants’ arguments unpersuasive and affirm the order of the trial court.

Defendants first argue that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs and denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We disagree. Summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Shankle v. ShankleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Byrne v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Lamica v. GerdesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCrann v. Pinehurst, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. HappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Namleb Corp. v. GarrettCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. HappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API