Shook v. Sexton
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tlie superior court for Lincoln county, Heal, L, entered February 27, 1904, in favor of the defendants, upon stipulated facts, after a trial before the court without a jury in an action of replevin.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
This is an ordinary action in replevin for the recovery of a horse. The value is alleged at $150. The defendants answered, alleging ownership and right to possession as purchasers at an impounding sale, made in pursuance of an ordinance of the town of Reardan, a municipal corporation of the fourth class in this state. A written stipulation in the record, signed by counsel for the respective parties, admits that the facts alleged in both the complaint and answer are true. The stipulation also contains the following:
“It is further stipulated that, if the court finds the ordinance set up in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Campbell v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Gilchrist v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Gosselink v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Dillard v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Nathan v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- McGowan v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Lindsey v. DerbyshireWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Seattle v. HewetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.