Dailey v. Craigmyle & Son Farms, L.L.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} Monty Craigmyle appeals the trial court’s summary judgment finding in Larry Dailey’s favor on Craigmyle’s counterclaim. Craigmyle alleged that he sold Dailey a used John Deere tractor and later, after the express warranty expired, he paid to repair it, but Dailey then refused to reimburse him. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment on his counterclaim, which apparently was based on the theory of detrimental reliance. Specifically, he contends that because the undisputed facts show that he paid to repair the tractor after the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kathleen McCarthy v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Had Enterprises v. GallowayOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hammond v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Simon Property Group, L.P. v. KillOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Strahler v. VesselsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.