Legal Opinion

Howell v. Estes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1888No. 6076PublishedCited by 59 opinions

Error from Collin. Tried below before the Hon. Richard Maltbie.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

Daniel Howell, being the owner of certain contiguous business lots in the city of McKinney, constructed upon two of them two brick buildings, each two stories in height, with a common or party wall between them. The lower story in each building was designed and used as a mercantile store house. In the upper stories offices were constructed which were leased to professional men.' The upper rooms of the two buildings were reached by a stairway which was attached to the partition wall and opened upon the street or public square in front of the structure. The stairway…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Buss v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Morrison v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Thompson v. MinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bickler v. BicklerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mitchell v. CastellawTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Ulbricht v. FriedsamTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Barrick v. GilletteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API