Legal Opinion

Newell v. Peters

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1966No. 32154PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Commissioner.

Action for damages for injuries to person and property as the result of an intersection collision of automobiles. The case was submitted upon instructions permitting a verdict for plaintiff for primary negligence of defendant in failing to keep a vigilant and proper lookout and upon humanitarian negligence of defendant in failing to stop. Verdict for plaintiff for $4000 on account of personal injuries and for $250 on account of property damage. Defendant’s motion for judgment in accordance with his motions for directed verdict was denied, but defendant’s motion for a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Interstate Airmotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Fisher v. GunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Frandeka v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Schmittzehe v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. Ford Motor CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Mather v. CarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Cox v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Powell ex rel. Powell v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Coulter v. Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API