Bethel v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNN, Justice.
Appellant, Anthony Lindon Bethel, appeals his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The jury assessed a penalty of nine-years confinement for the offense. We affirm.
Appellant raises two points of error and, pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 80(b), asks this Court to either reverse and remand, or reform the judgment to delete the deadly weapon finding. In his first point of error, appellant claims that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding of use or exhibition of a hammer or of a deadly weapon unknown to the grand jury. In the second point…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Saxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Blain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Denham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Thieu Quang Bui v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.