Middleton v. Cox
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentEllett, Justice
(dissenting) :
I am constrained to dissent because I do not think the guest-host relationship can he made out between Cox and Middleton. The guest statute was enacted to protect car owners and plane owners from suits by those who were riding for free and for their own business or pleasure. The relationship partakes more of a social nature than of business.1 Unless the element of “giving” a ride is involved, it is my understanding that the guest-host relationship is not established, and it is not necessary for the rider to pay money or property to the owner of the car or plane to make him a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- McGuire v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Dorn v. Village of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Dobbs v. SugiokaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Swinney v. RolerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.