Legal Opinion

Kirkland v. Tamplin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 25, 2007No. A07A1225PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Dwain Lee Kirkland appeals the summary judgment granted to defendants Christopher and Kelley Tamplin on Kirkland’s three claims against these defendants. As to the two claims for tortious interference, we hold that Kirkland failed to present competent evidence of the element of improper means. As to the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, we hold that defendants’ alleged conduct was not extreme and outrageous. Accordingly, we affirm.

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Disaster Services, Inc. v. ERC PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Architectural Manufacturing Co. v. Airotec, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Frank v. FLEET FINANCE, INC. OF GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. LaSonde v. Chase Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Dunbar Armored, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  2. C.R. Eng. v. Swift Transp. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
  3. C.R. England v. Swift TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Overka v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  5. Fortson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API