Legal Opinion
NICE Ltd. v. CallMiner Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 3, 2020No. 1:18-cv-02024Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NICE LTD., NICE SYSTEMS INC., and _) MATTERSIGHT CORP. ) Plaintiffs, V. Civil Action No. 18-2024-RGA-SRF CALLMINER, INC., Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the court in this patent infringement action is the partial! motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), filed by defendant CallMiner, Inc. (“CallMiner”).’ (D.I. 18) For the following reasons, I recommend that the court DENY the pending motion. IL.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.