In Re Marshall
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The respondent, Carl Marshall, a licensed and practicing attorney at law, has been charged by a special committee of the State Bar Association with offenses for which the said association has suggested that said respondent be disbarred. The charges are set forth in a lengthy, narrative statement, somewhat informal in character, but containing enough in allegations of fact to make out, if established by the evidence, a charge of misconduct in the nature of blackmail, and the committee does in express words charge said specific offense against the respondent.
The information filed by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- In re MeighenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- People ex rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. VarnumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re LathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1932