Legal Opinion

In Re Marshall

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1931No. 29418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, Carl Marshall, a licensed and practicing attorney at law, has been charged by a special committee of the State Bar Association with offenses for which the said association has suggested that said respondent be disbarred. The charges are set forth in a lengthy, narrative statement, somewhat informal in character, but containing enough in allegations of fact to make out, if established by the evidence, a charge of misconduct in the nature of blackmail, and the committee does in express words charge said specific offense against the respondent.

The information filed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. In re MeighenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People ex rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. VarnumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. In Re LathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API