Legal Opinion

Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

833 S.W.2d 896 (1992)

Carl E. HODGES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

S.C. TOOF & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Memphis.

April 20, 1992.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1992.

Tim Edwards, Glassman, Jeter, Edwards and Wade, P.C., Memphis, for plaintiff-appellant.

Carroll C. Johnson and Carroll C. Johnson, III, Johnson & Bateman, Memphis, for defendant-appellee.

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this retaliatory discharge action, Plaintiff-Appellant Carl E. Hodges alleges Defendant-Appellee S.C. Toof & Company terminated Plaintiff's employment because of his jury service. At trial, the jury…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · O'Brien; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · O'Brien.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API