Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1998No. F-95-1142Published

1Opinion of the Court

992 P.2d 332 (1998)

1998 OK CR 62

Julius Recardo YOUNG, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-95-1142.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

November 6, 1998.

Rehearing Denied February 19, 1999.

Jim Fransein, Stuart Southerland, Tulsa, Defense Counsel at trial.

Jay Holtzhouser, Ed Snow, Asst. District Attorneys, Tulsa, prosecutors at trial.

Paula J. Alfred, Assistant Public Defender, Tulsa, counsel on appeal.

W.A. Drew Edmondson, Atty. General of Oklahoma, William Humes, Asst. Attorney General, Oklahoma City, counsel on appeal.

OPINION

LANE, J.:

¶ 1 Julius Recardo Young was tried by jury in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API