Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Luzerne Silk Throwing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1929No. Appeal 8PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Defendant operates a silk throwing mill, in which raw silk is spun and prepared for customers in accordance with their specifications. It is known in the trade as a silk throwster. Plaintiff, a travelling salesman, who had been selling belting to defendant for sixteen years, alleges that on or about August 24, 1925, the defendant company, by its assistant manager, W. J. Griffiths, then acting in its behalf, promised orally to pay him 1% commission on a.ll money it received from the Amalgamated Silk Corporation, of Allentown, Pennsylvania, for work which it, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Long v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Fee v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Mahoning Valley Bread Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Dougherty Distillery Warehouse Co. v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beachler v. Mellon-Stuart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API