Legal Opinion

Twin Cities National Bank v. Anderson Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 5, 1923No. Nos. 23,706, 23,707PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

It appears that defendant, a manufacturer of farm implements, although possessing assets largely in excess of all liabilities, was unable to obtain sufficient ready money to pay past due and pressing obligations. Plaintiff, a creditor, applied for the appointment of a receiver for defendant to which defendant consented. Thereupon the court appointed as such receiver Luman C. Simons, who was president of plaintiff and also a director of defendant and the trustee under a deed of trust executed by defendant. Simons duly qualified as receiver, and pursuant to the instructions of the court took…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York & Western Union Telegraph Co. v. JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Ward v. GraffNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. In re Premier Cycle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  4. Fowler v. Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
  5. Gunn v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minnesota Hotel Co. v. Rosa Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API