Legal Opinion
Ackerman v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 22, 2024No. 3:23-cv-02382Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AMBER ACKERMAN on behalf of CASE NO. 3:23-cv-2382 B.A., Plaintiff, MAGISTRATE JUDGE vs. JAMES E. GRIMES JR. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. Amber Ackerman, on behalf of B.A., filed a Complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision denying Supplemental Security Income. This Court has jurisdiction under
42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c). The parties consented to my jurisdiction in this case. Doc. 8. Following review,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Angela M. Jones v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Theresa E. Foster v. William A. HalterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Margaret FELISKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Bass v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.