Legal Opinion

Grafft v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Beane

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1969No. Civ. 33344PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

The instant action, commenced on December 31, 1959, but not brought to trial within five years, was dismissed by the court on motion of defendants (Code Civ. Proc., § 583); from the judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals, Since dismissal upon the expiration of the five-year period becomes mandatory in the absence- of excusable delay making it impracticable to proceed to trial or where trial has commenced (not here pertinent) plaintiff’s appeal seeks to establish such delay or otherwise bring his case within one of “the implied exceptions engrafted upon the statute by appellate decisions.”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Weeks v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Continental Pacific Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Oberkotter v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Rio Vista Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diverco Constructors, Inc. v. WilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Elliano v. Assurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API