Legal Opinion

Swetich v. Smith

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1990No. 90-64PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.

Daniel Swetich signed a separation agreement in which he agreed to pay his wife Carolyn Smith, f/k/a Carolyn Swetich, alimony of $600 per month for ten years, with a six percent annual increase escalation factor. This negotiated separation agreement was incorporated into their divorce decree. Carolyn remarried and Daniel promptly stopped making his alimony payments. Daniel now appeals the district court decision which indicated his agreement to pay alimony did not automatically terminate upon Carolyn’s remarriage.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Daniel, as appellant, raises two issues:

1…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hendrickson v. HendricksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re the Marriage of ShimaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Sellers v. SellersWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Marquardt v. Marquardt by RempferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keller v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Madison v. MadisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Richardson v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Maher v. MaherWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Smith v. RobinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API