Gummo ex rel. Gummo v. Ward
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ fully-briefed Motion for Summary Judgment and to Strike Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs Expert (Docket No. 69).1 For the reasons that follow, the Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted in part and denied in part. The Motion to Strike will be denied, but, if necessary, the Court will hold a Daubert hearing2 (outside the presence of the jury) in relation to allowing the proffered expert to testify.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is a personal injury action that arose after two fifteen-year old girls, May-kayla…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bethie Pride v. Bic Corporation Societe Bic, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Biscan v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Greenwell v. BoatwrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- West v. East Tennessee Pioneer Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Collins v. DodsonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020