Legal Opinion
Lindstrom v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 14, 2007No. 06-8059PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Lindstrom appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action against the government for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Mr. Lind-strom filed suit to enforce a settlement agreement he reached with the Department of the Interior on his disability discrimination claim. He contends that the district court erroneously rejected subject matter jurisdiction over enforcement of an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)-mediated settlement agreement arising from an EEOC complaint. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Radil v. Sanborn Western Camps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Louie Morris, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. City of Hobart, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- San Juan County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Grynberg Ex Rel. Trust v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Sheryl Taylor v. Timothy GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Texas v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Berry v. GutierrezDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.