Legal Opinion

In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust Litigation

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2003No. NonePublished

1Opinion of the Court

657 N.W.2d 668 (2003)

2003 SD 19

In re SOUTH DAKOTA MICROSOFT ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

No. 22306.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued November 20, 2002.

Decided February 12, 2003.

Charles B. Casper of Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, David B. Tulchin, Joseph E. Neuhaus, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, New York, NY, Gene N. Lebrun of Lynn, Jackson, Shultz & Lebrun, P.C., Rapid City, South Dakota Attorneys for appellant Microsoft.

Mark A. Moreno of Schmidt, Schroyer & Moreno, PC, Pierre, South Dakota, Ben Barnow of Barnow & Associates, P.C., Chicago, IL, Leonard B. Simon of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API