Legal Opinion

People v. Salazar

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1968No. Crim. 14099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFord, P. J.

This is an appeal by the People from an order dismissing an information upon the ground that before the filing thereof the defendant had not been legally committed by a magistrate. (Pen. Code, § 995.)

The person who signed the complaint as the “declarant and complainant” did not do so under oath but, in lieu of so doing, above his signature he made the following statement: “I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.” It is the defendant’s position, which he promptly asserted before the magistrate when the matter was called for the preliminary examination, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SesslinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. MullaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. People v. BalthazarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kulshrestha v. First Union Commercial Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API