Legal Opinion

Richards v. Rule

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1919No. 15-2597PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Seventh Supreme Judicial District. Suit by T. J. Richards against Johnnie Floyce Rule. A judgment for plaintiff was reversed, and judgment rendered for defendant-by the Court of Civil Appeals (159 S. W. 386), and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The plaintiff, T. J. Richards, sued Johnnie Floyce Rule to remove cloud from the title to 27 town lots in Paducah, Oottle county, Tex. The case has been twice tried, and each time without the intervention of a jury. Judgment in the lower court was for the plaintiff on both trials. The first appeal resulted on the original hearing in an af-firmance, and on motion for rehearing in reversing and remanding the cause. 149 S. W. 1073. On the second appeal the judgment was reversed and rendered in favor of the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff failed both to allege and to prove that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Willis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Paris & Great Northern Railroad v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Rule v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Rule v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Ex Parte ParvinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mills v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Snell v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Speckels v. KneipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Elanco Products Company v. Akin-TunnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. NoackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API