Legal Opinion
Kenko, Inc. v. Lowry Hill Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 12, 1986No. C6-86-498PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Respondent, Kenko, Inc. (Kenko), a subcontractor, brought suit against the general contractor Lowry Hill Construction Company (Lowry Hill) for money due on a contract between the parties. The trial court held that as a matter of law the contract was a “unit price” contract and that Kenko had established the quantities of unit price items used in the project. The jury found that the construction had been completed in two stages thus entitling Ken-ko to higher prices for the second stage of construction. Kenko was awarded $58,-407.04. On appeal, Lowry Hill claims that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Lamb Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Kraus-Anderson of Minneapolis, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Duffy v. Park Terrace Supper Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Holtberg v. BommersbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Advanced Medical, Inc. v. Arden Medical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 v. County of St. LouisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Advanced Medical, Inc. v. Arden Medical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992