Legal Opinion

Food MacHinery and Chemical Corporation, a Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 14, 1966No. 83-60PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Senior Judge.

Taxpayer, Food Machinery and Chemical Corporation (FMC), claims a refund of income tax for the year 1950. 1 Tax payer’s claim is based on an allowance for depletion of phosphate shale deposits on the Fort Hall Indian Reservation near Pocatello, Idaho. Since 1948, FMC, under an agreement with J. R. Simplot, lessee of the deposits, received mined phosphate shale for use in the production of elemental phosphorus at its electric furnaces near Pocatello. FMC paid Simplot to mine the shale and also bore the expense of a 10 percent royalty payment to the Indian mine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Helvering v. Twin Bell Oil SyndicateSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Paragon Jewel Coal Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weaver v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. CSX Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  3. Briscoe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Missouri Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Inland Steel Co.United States Court of Claims · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API