Morley v. Morley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
The only question now before us in this case is whether the appeal should be dismissed on respondent’s motion.
On January 5,1923, judgment was made in favor of respondent and against the appellant, and on the same day it was filed with the clerk of the court. Thereafter the court made a formal order denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial. This order is dated September 19,1923, but was not filed with the clerk of court until October 15 of the same year. If the time for appeal *78began to run on the date the order was filed, the notice of appeal was in due time, otherwise it was not.
Under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Brown v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Quareles v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Wood, Curtis Co. v. Missouri Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- In re Estate of PearsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Puckett v. GuntherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ainslie v. MossWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Kelly v. St. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Malott v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973