Legal Opinion
Gesler v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided August 23, 2001No. CIV.A.3:99CV-464-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SIMPSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before us for consideration of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). The motion having been thoroughly briefed, it is now ripe for review.
BACKGROUND
i The factual background relevant to Ford’s motion is largely undisputed:
1. During the summer of 1998, Ford retained TKS .Industrial Company (“TKS”) to demolish, remove, and replace the Phosphate/E-Coat System (“E-Coat System”) located at Ford’s Louisville Assembly Plant (“LAP”).
2. The E-Coat System prevents automobile body corrosion through the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,133 Steven Gregg v. Allen-Bradley Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Hartsel v. KeysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. CainKentucky Supreme Court · 2007
- Franke v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005
- Krahwinkel v. Commonwealth Aluminum Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Krahwinkel v. Commonwealth Aluminum Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006