Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Craig

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 12, 2002No. 1-01-1993Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE QUINN,

specially concurring:

I concur in all of the holdings in the opinion except for the holding that Craig had standing to raise the issue of the alleged violation of Taylor’s and Bishop’s fifth amendment rights. This court has recently reaffirmed that “[t]he law is clear that a defendant has no standing to raise an alleged violation of a witness’ fifth amendment rights. People v. Govea, 299 Ill. App. 3d 76, 84, 701 N.E.2d 76 (1998); People v. Adams, 283 Ill. App. 3d 520, 524, 669 N.E.2d 1331 (1996). This is because the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination is a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API