Legal Opinion
Consolidated Laundries Corp. v. Craft
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
Respondent Craft was employed by petitioner, Consolidated Laundries Corp., as. a routeman serving family laundry customers. Craft and Consolidated were parties to a restrictive covenant agreement originally executed between Craft and Knickerbocker Laundry and later assigned to Consolidated when it purchased the family laundry business of Knickerbocker in August 1959. The agreement provided that Craft would not, within a period of one year after the termination of his employment, serve or solicit the customers of the laundry and would not engage in the laundry or…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Curtis Bay Towing Co. v. National Maritime Union of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- In re Contessa Lingerie, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Giba v. International Union of Electrical WorkersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1962