Legal Opinion

Doe v. Woodard

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 3, 2019No. 18-1066PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHESON, Circuit Judge.

*1285 I.B., a minor child, and her mother, Jane Doe (collectively, "Does"), claim that April Woodard, a caseworker from the El Paso County Department of Human Services ("DHS"), a state agency, wrongfully searched I.B. at the Head Start preschool program in Colorado Springs. Without consent or a warrant, Ms. Woodard partially undressed I.B., performed a visual examination for signs of abuse, then photographed I.B.'s private areas and partially unclothed body.

In their lawsuit, the Does alleged that Ms. Woodard and other DHS officials violated the Fourth Amendment's…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. Randy Cole v. Michael HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Colbruno v. KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Hinkle v. Beckham County Board of CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. Frasier v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  5. Joseph Zadeh v. Mari RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API