Legal Opinion
Harvey Barnett, Inc. v. Shidler
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 16, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-B-731PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Harvey Barnett, Inc. and Infant Swimming Research (collectively “ISR”) bring claims for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, unjust enrichment, trademark infringement, Lan-ham Act violations, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices, and exemplary damages. Defendants, Ann Shidler, Judy Heumann, Allison Geerdes, and Infant Aquatic Survival (collectively “Defendants”) counter-claim for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, breach of fiducia ry duty, tortious interference with contract and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- The Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Daryl B. Lundgrin v. W. Graham Claytor, Secretary of the Navy of the United States, and the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- SCFC ILC, Inc. v. Visa USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Joyce L. Walmer v. United States Department of Defense and Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. WorldQuest Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Bad Ass Coffee Co. of Hawaii, Inc. v. JH Nterprises, L.L.C.District Court, D. Utah · 2009
- Energex Enterprises, Inc. v. Anthony Doors, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- City Partnership Co. v. IR-TCI Partners V, L.P.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Carrio Cabling Corporation v. Stryker CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.