Legal Opinion

State v. Creech (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2016No. 2014-1844PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellee, Stedmund Creech, was charged with three counts of violating R.C. 2923.13; under that statute, persons previously convicted of, or under indictment for, certain felonies are prohibited from possessing firearms. Creech sought to limit how much the jury could learn about the underlying offenses upon which the weapons charges were based. We consider whether the trial court abused its discretion by not allowing Creech to stipulate to his prior convictions and indictment and by admitting the full record of his prior offenses. We adopt the reasoning of the United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Oberlin v. Akron General Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. CreechOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. McLaughlinOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. TyusOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. City of Cleveland v. GieringOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API