Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 21, 2009No. A08A1785, A08A1786PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doyle, Judge.

Following our grant of their applications for interlocutory appeal, John David Bell and Carl Winkler appeal the trial court’s order denying their motions to suppress evidence seized from Bell’s automobile following a traffic stop. We reverse because the officers’ search of Bell’s vehicle for weapons was not justified under the circumstances.

1. Winkler first argues that the trial court’s approval of the State’s previous motion to enter nolle prosequi precluded the State from contesting the motion to suppress. We disagree.

On September 20, 2007, the prosecutor moved to enter nolle…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Buice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Silva v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bodiford v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Culpepper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Nunnally v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. The STATE v. ALLEN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API