Legal Opinion

Teague v. Grand River Dam Authority

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1968No. 67-C-249PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, the Response of Defendant thereto, and the briefs submitted by the parties, the Court finds that said Motion to Remand should be denied.

Plaintiff’s decedent drowned at Grand Lake while water skiing when he passed through an open flood gate in the dam. The Defendant operates the dam under a 50-year license from the Federal Power Commission.

In her Complaint, the Plaintiff complains of negligence on the part of the Defendant in (1) failing to warn of a dangerous condition; (2) failing to provide a barrier in front…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jacob M. Poss v. Jerome LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Julie R. Blitz v. Janet M. Boog, Julie R. Blitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. People of State of Colorado v. MaxwellDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954
  4. City of Norfolk, Virginia v. McFarlandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1956
  5. Logemann v. StockDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  2. W. H. Pat O'Bryan v. Stephen S. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003
  5. Little v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API