Legal Opinion
Patel v. Dhaduk
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 2, 2019No. 3:17-cv-02243Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MUKESHKUMAR B. PATEL, Plaintiff, NO. 3:17-cv-02243 v. (JUDGE CAPUTO) VITHALBHAI D. DHADUK, a/k/a. VITHAL D. DHADUK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Presently before me 1s the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39) filed by Plaintff, Mukeshkumar B. Patel. Patel filed suit against the Defendant, Vithal D. Dhaduk to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract regarding the parties’ Memorandum of Understanding. (See Doc. 1). Patel asserts that the Memorandum of Understanding is a binding contract, and Dhaduk breached it by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alexandra Chavarriaga v. State of NJ Department of CorrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Reginald D. Ware Ware Communications, Inc. v. Rodale Press, Inc. Ware CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.