Andrisani v. Saugus Colony Limited
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
By these appeals, 1 plaintiff and appellant Albert Andrisani challenges the dismissal of his complaint for failure to post the security required following a finding by the trial court that appellant is a vexatious litigant. Appellant contends (1) the trial court was without jurisdiction—due to a pending appeal and a Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 2 peremptory challenge—to issue the orders appealed from, and (2) the orders constitute an abuse of discretion. We dismiss the first appeal (No. B062500) as moot and, in the second appeal (No. B064182), affirm the judgment of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. West Coast Shows, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. Christian J.California Court of Appeal · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McAllister v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Frisk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bellows v. Aliquot Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Andrisani v. HoodackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Lazo v. Vidaurreta CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.