Voogd v. JOINT DRAIN. DIST., KOSSUTH & WINNEBAGO COS.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentUhlenhopp, Justice
The problem arose in this way. Supervisors are required to keep agricultural drains in repair. Code, 1962, § 455.135. At the time of the events in question, supervisors could proceed with repairs on their own initiative and assess the cost in accordance with the original apportionment of benefits in the district, when the estimated cost of repair did not exceed 50% of the original cost of “the district.” § 455.135. If the estimated cost exceeded such 50%, notice had to be given and hearing held before repairs could be undertaken. The supervisors involved in this case thought the words “the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Gilmore v. HentigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Branting v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Sheridan v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Thompson v. Joint Drainage District No. 3-11Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.