Legal Opinion

Eatherton v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1991No. 89-39PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The primary issue for us to resolve in this case is whether, in a criminal trial, the prosecution must be foreclosed from introducing evidence to establish one or more of the elements of the crime if that evidence also depicts conduct that would tend to establish a crime of which the defendant was acquitted in a prior trial. In the first trial, Patrick Eatherton (Eatherton) was convicted of burglary, but acquitted of larceny, with both charges arising out of a continuum of circumstances. The trial court ruled that the State was not foreclosed from introducing evidence that the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. York v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Arevalo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. AparoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API