Legal Opinion

Blaylock v. United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied, Industrial and Service Workers International Union

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 26, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00299Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA DIVISION CHARLES R. BLAYLOCK, ) ) ) 1:18-CV-00299-DCLC Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STEEL, PAPER, AND ) FORESTRY, RUBBER, ) MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED, ) INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, and Local 899 of the Union (collectively “USW”) have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 36], supporting memorandum [Doc. 37],…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API