Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. Texas Mexican Railway Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1959No. 17455Published

1DissentRives, Circuit Judge

Being in substantial agreement with the carefully considered opinions of the learned district court,1 I respectfully dissent.

It is elementary that the burden rests-on the shipper to prove delivery to the-carrier in good condition before he can recover for the damaged condition of the shipment upon its arrival at destination. To meet that burden as to each of the 1462 carloads of cantaloupes, the shippers relied on the bills of lading issued' by the carrier at Laredo, Texas. Those-bills of lading acknowledged receipt “in apparent good order and condition” of each of the cars, described by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. C. C. Whitnack Produce Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API